Banner
Training & Education

Where it counts

By Udo O.J. Huff, M.ED.

April 2010 - Consider this situation: Grants become available, so Company X decides to implement employee training for machining, welding, robot programming or metrology.

But why is Company X doing this, and what's the anticipated outcome? The answer often is, "Money is available, and we can place a training plaque in the lobby."

These efforts don't cut it when it comes to enhancing workforce development. Rather, they only foster the mentality that training is an overhead, not an asset, and that training should be done only when it's needed.

This argument is common in the industry, but it leads to certain questions:

  • How are your products doing in the market?
  • Does your company do a process recovery? (Six Sigma)
  • How much rework do you have in production?
  • Is there a large turnover of skilled labor?
  • Does the current applicant pool have the skills your company requires to replace an aging workforce?

    It's time to assess your company and determine its needs, as well as the correlation between workforce development and production--especially if your sales numbers are low.

    Step 1
    To establish a base for further reference, you must first conduct a needs assessment. This can be done statistically, through a Six Sigma toolbox, process discovery (causes and effects) or other measures.

    Step 2
    Next, you must investigate the training options. The first is long-term training, which is based on performance (see chart below).

    The other option is short-term training. For example, a company could offer a short-term training course in applied blueprint reading, geometric tolerances and metrology application that lasts, say, 20 hours.

    But when it comes to short-term training courses, it doesn't really matter how long they take. Rather, if a company wants to measure the results of short-term training, it must conduct both a pre- and post-training evaluation.

    The former provides a foundation, giving companies a baseline from which to measure the results of training. To put it another way, how do you know what your employees have learned if you are unaware of what they knew before the training session?

    With the pre-evaluation and post-evaluation setting a base of comparison, measurability is quickly available by the influence of performance-based training via increased productivity and quality.

    Step 3
    This is especially important for Company X--it must determine whether long-term training does, in fact, affect performance. It must then evaluate the training based on the production performance established in Step 1.

    Additionally, Company X must decide whether to implement short-term training. If it does, it must include pre- and post-evaluation and testing if it wants to be able to measure the results of the training.

    Step 4
    The final step involves measurable training results reflected in production. After four to six weeks, when employees are again integrated into the production process, Company X should compare the results with the established baseline.

    The outcome should be a measurable increase in the production rate, with reduced repair work and higher quality overall. This is quantifiable and has a positive impact throughout the company.

    This should be the training tool for further reference of workforce development with measurable training efforts and a return on investment. FFJ

  • LATEST ISSUE  
    Cover FFJ1123

    lineclearNOVEMBER 2023

    RAISING STEEL

    Fabricators and Erectors Work Together to Shape the Future

    Udo O.J. Huff, M.ED.

    Banner

    Company Profiles

    AIR FILTRATION

    IRONWORKERS

    NICKEL ALLOY

    SERVICE CENTERS

    Camfil APC - Equipment Trilogy Machinery Inc. Sandmeyer Steel Company
    Admiral Steel
    Camfil APC - Replacement Filters     Alliance Steel
     Donaldson Company Inc.    

    LASER TECHNOLOGY

    PLASMA TECHNOLOGY

     BENDING/FOLDING AMADA AMERICA, INC.

    SOFTWARE

    MetalForming Inc.

    Mazak Optonics Corp.

    PLATE

    Enmark Systems Inc.
    RAS Systems LLC
    MC Machinery Systems Inc. Peddinghaus Lantek Systems Inc.
     Murata Machinery, USA, Inc. Sandmeyer Steel Company SigmaTEK Systems LLC
    TRUMPF Inc.

    PLATE & ANGLE ROLLS

    Striker Systems
          Bayern Software

    BEVELING

    Trilogy Machinery Inc.
    Steelmax Tools LLC

    LINEAR POSITION SENSORS

       MTS Sensors   STAINLESS STEEL
          Sandmeyer Steel Company

    COIL PROCESSING

     MATERIAL HANDLING

    PRESS BRAKE TOOLING

    STAMPING/PRESSES

    Bradbury Group

    EMH Crane

    Mate Precision Tooling AIDA-America Corp.
    Burghardt + Schmidt Group Fehr Warehouse Solutions Inc.
    Rolleri USA Nidec Press & Automation
    Butech Bliss

    PRESS BRAKES

    STEEL

    Red Bud Industries UFP Industrial AMADA AMERICA, INC. Alliance Steel
          Texas Iron and Metal
          SURPLUS STEEL
          Texas Iron and Metal

    MEASUREMENT & QUALITY CONTROL

    Automec Inc.

    TUBE & PIPE

     

    Advanced Gauging Technologies MC Machinery Systems Inc. BLM Group

    METAL FABRICATION MACHINERY

    SafanDarley HGG Profiling Equipment Inc.
       Cincinnati Inc.   National Tube Supply

    DEBURRING/FINISHING

    ATI Industrial Automation

    PUNCHING

    Prudential Stainless & Alloys

    ARKU

    Scotchman Industries Inc.

    LVD Strippit Hougen Manufacturing

     

    Lissmac Corp. Trilogy Machinery Inc.

    SAWING

    SuperMax Tools   Behringer Saws Inc. WATERJET
    Timesavers   Cosen Saws Barton International
    Randbright
    DoALL Sawing
    Jet Edge Waterjet Systems

    METAL FORMING

    HE&M Saw
    Omax Corp.
    HYDRAULIC PRESSES FAGOR Arrasate USA Inc. Savage Saws

    WELDING

    Beckwood Press Co.
     MetalForming Inc.    American Weldquip

    Triform

        Strong Hand Tools
    IDENTIFICATION/TRACKING

    MICROFINISHING TOOLS

    T. J. Snow Company
    InfoSight
    Titan Tool Supply Inc.

     

           
         

    TPMG2022 Brands


    BPA_WW_MASTER.jpg