Banner
Guest Editorial

Welding fume control

By Jeremiah Wann

How to choose between an ambient system and a source capture system

FFJ 0517 guest leadMay 2017 - We frequently get asked for advice about the best type of system for weld fume management. These requests come from companies with as few as 20 welders to those with more than 100. Many of them  face the same dilemma: Will an ambient system or a source capture system work better in our facility?

In an ideal situation, welders would always have a source capture, such as a portable collector, fume arm or a hood, at their work area. A source capture is the most effective way to prevent exposure to fumes. There’s only one problem with this: welders do not use source captures. 

In some facilities, welders work in a booth where they remain in one location. For this type of work, a hood is very effective. In many facilities, though, the pieces being assembled stay in one place, while the welders move from cell to cell. This means that as they move, they need to take the portable collector or fume arm with them to each work station. 

Ideally, welders would always have a source capture at the site where they are welding. But when we visit facilities, that is not what we see. Fume arms, hoods and portable collectors are almost never used as directed. They don’t get positioned where they ought to be, welders don’t move them to the next work cell and, as a result, source capture methods are not doing their job.

Why is it so difficult to use the source capture techniques? Fume arms and other source capture methods are inconvenient and time consuming. They have to be dragged along and repositioned constantly, and they often get in the way of the work itself. Moving them interrupts and distracts welders. Every time we visit a facility with this type of system, we see that it is not being used properly. 

Measuring for exposure to fumes usually involves testing the air directly around the welder as he or she works. If you test for a short-term exposure limit (STEL), measured over a 15-minute period, the welder under the source capture would have a lower exposure. 

However, if you test for the permissible exposure limit (PEL)—a time-weighted average used by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)—you would get different results. The PEL is usually measured over eight hours. For this standard, it’s not the exposure at any one moment that matters; it’s the average level of exposure over an entire workday. 

Using a source capture system, you might find a welder had a very low exposure level while working under the fume arm. However, half an hour later, that welder moved to another station but did not take the fume arm along. Unless that welder spends most of the day using that fume arm correctly, his average exposure could easily exceed the PEL standard.

Through observation, we know welders aren’t using fume arms, hoods or portable collectors properly. This means that installing a source capture system, with the extra expense involved in all of the ductwork for each source capture point, may be wasting a lot of money. 

In a perfect world, a source capture system would be the best solution for welding. In the real world, in which welders labor every day, an ambient system often is the better choice. 

An ambient system constantly changes the air inside the facility. Overall levels of fumes are lower, regardless of where you’re working. The ambient system does not require any effort or inconvenience from the welders; it works all the time without anyone doing anything. 

In some situations, you absolutely must have a hood or fume arm and it must be working correctly. For example, if the material being welded produces hexavalent chromium, there is an OSHA limit that can never be exceeded. For situations like this, the best choice may be a hybrid system with a few source capture points tied into the ambient system. 

The biggest problem with source capture systems is getting workers to use them correctly. The biggest advantage of an ambient system is that you get consistently clean air without anyone doing anything. Worker safety is always the goal. When you consider the practical problems with a source capture system, you might find that an ambient system is the best way to reach that goal. FFJ

Sources

Banner

Company Profiles

AIR FILTRATION

IRONWORKERS

NICKEL ALLOY

SERVICE CENTERS

Camfil APC - Equipment Trilogy Machinery Inc. Sandmeyer Steel Company
Admiral Steel
Camfil APC - Replacement Filters     Alliance Steel
 Donaldson Company Inc.    

LASER TECHNOLOGY

PLASMA TECHNOLOGY

 BENDING/FOLDING AMADA AMERICA, INC.

SOFTWARE

MetalForming Inc.

Mazak Optonics Corp.

PLATE

Enmark Systems Inc.
RAS Systems LLC
MC Machinery Systems Inc. Peddinghaus Lantek Systems Inc.
 Murata Machinery, USA, Inc. Sandmeyer Steel Company SigmaTEK Systems LLC
TRUMPF Inc.

PLATE & ANGLE ROLLS

Striker Systems
      Bayern Software

BEVELING

Trilogy Machinery Inc.
Steelmax Tools LLC

LINEAR POSITION SENSORS

   MTS Sensors   STAINLESS STEEL
      Sandmeyer Steel Company

COIL PROCESSING

 MATERIAL HANDLING

PRESS BRAKE TOOLING

STAMPING/PRESSES

Bradbury Group

EMH Crane

Mate Precision Tooling AIDA-America Corp.
Burghardt + Schmidt Group Fehr Warehouse Solutions Inc.
Rolleri USA Nidec Press & Automation
Butech Bliss

PRESS BRAKES

STEEL

Red Bud Industries UFP Industrial AMADA AMERICA, INC. Alliance Steel
      Texas Iron and Metal
      SURPLUS STEEL
      Texas Iron and Metal

MEASUREMENT & QUALITY CONTROL

Automec Inc.

TUBE & PIPE

 

Advanced Gauging Technologies MC Machinery Systems Inc. BLM Group

METAL FABRICATION MACHINERY

SafanDarley HGG Profiling Equipment Inc.
   Cincinnati Inc.   National Tube Supply

DEBURRING/FINISHING

ATI Industrial Automation

PUNCHING

Prudential Stainless & Alloys

ARKU

Scotchman Industries Inc.

LVD Strippit Hougen Manufacturing

 

Lissmac Corp. Trilogy Machinery Inc.

SAWING

SuperMax Tools   Behringer Saws Inc. WATERJET
Timesavers   Cosen Saws Barton International
Randbright
DoALL Sawing
Jet Edge Waterjet Systems

METAL FORMING

HE&M Saw
Omax Corp.
HYDRAULIC PRESSES FAGOR Arrasate USA Inc. Savage Saws

WELDING

Beckwood Press Co.
 MetalForming Inc.    American Weldquip

Triform

    Strong Hand Tools
IDENTIFICATION/TRACKING

MICROFINISHING TOOLS

T. J. Snow Company
InfoSight
Titan Tool Supply Inc.

 

       
     

TPMG2022 Brands


BPA_WW_MASTER.jpg